Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Password etiquette
I'm standing in queue at my bank to encash a self cheque, because, for once, the transaction has to be done faster than online transfer between banks affords.
My signature barely matches what the bank insists it is. In about five years of holding this account, I'm yet to finish my first cheque book. I do all my transacting online. My password is my signature.
I use a different password everywhere. I remember all my passwords, or at least all the more frequently used ones, trusting the rest to a password manager.
I never change passwords. My method of remembering tens of unique passwords doesn't work when they have to change.
And so when a site demands a password change every fifteen days as security precaution, my system breaks down entirely. I cycle through the same three passwords across all such sites. My account's security is actually weakened as a result.
Some may say that this will all change with biometrics. I don't buy that. Biometrics will face far more resistance than passwords because it conflates identity with authorisation. It requires changing the fundamental trust patterns of society, which is not an easy sale.
We're going to be a password-based society for some time. How long will it be before a class on password management becomes as elementary as one on letter writing in school?
My signature barely matches what the bank insists it is. In about five years of holding this account, I'm yet to finish my first cheque book. I do all my transacting online. My password is my signature.
I use a different password everywhere. I remember all my passwords, or at least all the more frequently used ones, trusting the rest to a password manager.
I never change passwords. My method of remembering tens of unique passwords doesn't work when they have to change.
And so when a site demands a password change every fifteen days as security precaution, my system breaks down entirely. I cycle through the same three passwords across all such sites. My account's security is actually weakened as a result.
Some may say that this will all change with biometrics. I don't buy that. Biometrics will face far more resistance than passwords because it conflates identity with authorisation. It requires changing the fundamental trust patterns of society, which is not an easy sale.
We're going to be a password-based society for some time. How long will it be before a class on password management becomes as elementary as one on letter writing in school?
skjaidev — Aug 7, 2007 4:58:40 PM — # ↩
I'm gonna resist biometrics as long as I can. I'd rather have my eye / finger than my money / email.
chaitrasuresh — Aug 8, 2007 1:06:08 AM — # ↩
vaishaksuresh — Aug 8, 2007 9:09:46 AM — # ↩
deponti — Aug 7, 2007 9:18:13 PM — # ↩
Could you explain that...I didn't understand...I,personally, would like biometrics, because my iris or my finger is unique...
Kiran Jonnalagadda — Aug 7, 2007 10:59:26 PM — # ↩
The hardware device you interface with, whether a fingerprint scanner or iris scanner, converts your physical characteristics into a stream of bytes. The rest of the system depends on those bytes, not your actual physical characteristics. Those bytes are just like a password, except they never change. The same password everywhere, for all your life. And because they're digital bytes, a copy can be perfectly reproduced.
A signature or a password is a form of authorisation. You supply them to indicate you are authorising something. You are not your signature or password. Biometric authentication does not differentiate between the two.
When identity and authorisation are separate, you can do things like signing a blank cheque for a joint account or giving your daughter your ATM card with the PIN number to withdraw some money. You can't do anything of the sort with biometrics.
The deal breaker is not in how secure or insecure something is, but in the fact that it requires you to change the ways in which you trust and deal with the people around you to be able to use this technology.
deponti — Aug 7, 2007 11:32:41 PM — # ↩
You make me think, Jace, and thank you for that.
fus — Aug 9, 2007 10:10:04 PM — # ↩
offline
jbritto — Aug 7, 2007 11:47:54 PM — # ↩
teemus — Aug 8, 2007 5:30:07 PM — # ↩
thaths — Aug 11, 2007 4:35:45 AM — # ↩
Kiran Jonnalagadda — Aug 11, 2007 9:04:21 AM — # ↩
januarybitch — Aug 15, 2007 6:23:20 PM — # ↩