How should I post pictures?

Sunday, March 27, 2005

Poll: should I upload all my pictures at once, or one at a time? I’ve shot over 300 so far and have several nice ones. As a group they won’t get individual attention, and by posting one at a time, I’ll have enough to cover lean periods. But most of these are simply pretty pictures with nothing unique to say. They have more meaning in a group. All at once or one at a time?

What say you?

kaustubhhere — Mar 27, 2005 1:24:02 PM — # ↩

Why not post them in batches? say 10-15 at once, I think they'll get individual attention that way and the unique ones will stand out. :)
appaji — Mar 27, 2005 1:52:34 PM — # ↩

I would like to see them the way *you* want to show them :-)
- prabhakar_m — Mar 27, 2005 1:59:20 PM — # ↩
  
  I fully agree.
- fox2mike — Mar 27, 2005 3:00:29 PM — # ↩
  
  This sounds the best...
  - vaishaksuresh — Mar 27, 2005 5:08:06 PM — # ↩
    
    I second that.
- kalyancreddy — Mar 27, 2005 9:19:18 PM — # ↩
  
  I *agrees*
- manubhardwaj — Mar 27, 2005 10:28:28 PM — # ↩
  
  No offense :-), but this is like a quote from the Dilbert book "The Way of the Weasel". When the President asks the VP his opinion, the VP wakes up and says in all seriousness, "I think what you think." !!
  - appaji — Mar 28, 2005 12:37:46 AM — # ↩
    
    Funny indeed :-)
teemus — Mar 27, 2005 2:32:00 PM — # ↩

A Jace-picture-a-day makes for a cool weekday!
- fox2mike — Mar 27, 2005 3:00:10 PM — # ↩
  
  and 300 pics would make for a cool year eh? :p
  - Kiran Jonnalagadda — Mar 28, 2005 10:31:43 PM — # ↩
    
    Hah! 300 unique pictures is... rather improbable. I mostly shot the same scene several times with slight variations, so expect to see under 10% left when I'm done pruning.
- kalyancreddy — Mar 27, 2005 9:20:02 PM — # ↩
  
  I am sure he will shoot a lot mroe meanwhile, we do not want to miss any?.
manish — Mar 27, 2005 3:38:28 PM — # ↩

How about..

Group 'em up, and re-post the 'nice' ones separately, with a helpful caption "btw, this comes from [ post ] group...".
kalyancreddy — Mar 27, 2005 9:18:50 PM — # ↩

What if you can post most of the simply pretty pictures you think shall have meaning as a group together and save the several nice ones for the lean periods to be posted singly.
eppendorfs — Mar 27, 2005 9:39:43 PM — # ↩

Roll on the " aces of jace" :)
irq2 — Mar 28, 2005 9:41:58 AM — # ↩

Be a guest blogger at Shruthi Geographic ;-)
latelyontime — Mar 28, 2005 12:17:10 PM — # ↩

definitely in batches...your pictures are more interesting bacause of the write up you provide with them and a group publishing wouldnt do justice to the ideas behind the pics.
- Kiran Jonnalagadda — Mar 28, 2005 10:32:33 PM — # ↩
  
  I think I will do that. Thanks.
nileshc — Mar 28, 2005 2:39:36 PM — # ↩

A post at a time ...
... is what I'd say. However, keep the group option too, in case you have a bunch of photos with very strong co-relation or taken at the same place or same time. It is silly having an album called 'nature pics'. Something like 'The Heritage Mile' is much better. That's how my photoblog's 'album' section is the least updated. But I can't do without it either.
nome — Mar 28, 2005 10:19:06 PM — # ↩

Tar.Gz
tar'em up and upload to me :) I am desperately in need of some cool desktop wallpapers, Havnt found any good ones lately.
- Kiran Jonnalagadda — Mar 28, 2005 10:26:38 PM — # ↩
  
  Re: Tar.Gz
  Patience, my man. They're coming, and at good frequency to keep your desktop fresh.